By
Janet Phelan
The US has a history of making inaccurate statements to international
bodies in order to advance its global agenda. One need only look at the
statements made on the international stage prior to the invasion of Iraq
to realize that the intention to invade Iraq was not going to be
hindered by a realistic assessment of its “weapons of mass destruction”
program.
In recent UN convenings, we are now seeing false statements put on the
record by high-ranking US officials concerning the US’s domestic agenda.
As the UN has no dominion over the domestic issues within the United
States, one can only view these coordinated efforts by the US officials
as a studied effort at propaganda.
This past May, the UN reviewed the human rights
record of the United States. Known as the UPR (Universal Periodic
Review), this session in May marked the second such review, the first
having taken place in 2010. Civil society was invited to submit reports
and over ninety NGOs and grassroots organizations did so. In addition,
over 110 UN member nations also voiced their concerns as to the US’s
human rights record.
Criticisms and concerns were entered on many different issues. The
failed campaign promise of President Obama to close the detention center
at Guantanamo Bay was mentioned repeatedly. So were the failures of the
United States to ratify many human rights treaties, including the
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Convention on the
Rights of the Child, The International Covenant on Economic, Social and
Cultural Rights, The International Convention for the Protection of All
Persons from Enforced Disappearance as well as other international
treaties.
Racial profiling and police killings of US citizens, many if not most
being African Americans, were raised as consistent concerns. In
addition, recommendations were made that the US halt its application of
the death penalty and also establish a national human rights agency.
The tone of the US response was quite a bit different from the tack
taken in 2010. Gone were the promises, empty as they were. Instead, the
US adopted a regimented and in some cases a somewhat belligerent defense
of what might be considered indefensible activities. And where
belligerence might have failed to impress, outright lies were employed.
Muted belligerence was clearly in evidence in the statements made
by Brigadier General Richard Gross, legal counsel to the Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, who addressed concerns about Guantanamo Bay and
the detainees. “The detainees are detained lawfully,” he declared.
According to Gross, there were 242 detainees at the beginning of the
Obama administration and 116 have been transferred out since then. He
stated that 122 remain. As these figures omit four individuals, it is
assumed that they have died.
Alarmingly, Gross made the following revelations: Of the remaining 122,
he told us, 57 are designated for transfer. Out of the 65 others, 10 are
currently facing charges or have been convicted. The remaining 55, he
stated, will be reviewed by the periodic review board. In other words,
55 individuals have been detained for years without being charged. This
is hardly in accordance with US law, which guarantees a speedy trial,
among other legal considerations.
And it is US law which pertains to the detainees. Supreme Court
decisions have granted the detainees protections under US law, including
the right of habeas corpus. Over 200 writs of habeas corpus have been
filed by Guantanamo Bay detainees. Not one has been granted.
Police abuse is of grave concern to many different sectors. The US
attempted to assuage these concerns with outright lies. Indeed, the US
continued on with its hooey about the non-existent “hundreds of federal
prosecutions” for police abuse that it tried to front a few months back
at the Convention Against Torture meeting in Geneva. As discussed in
this
article, the actual numbers of federal prosecutions for police abuse could be counted on the fingers of one hand.
Rather than correct the previous misstatements, the US officials
amplified the bogus figures, and cited a total of 400 such prosecutions.
The Big Lie is always the best, and for those who gagged on the
overblown figure of 330 such prosecutions stated at the CAT by Assistant
Attorney General David Bitkower a few months back, the new figure of
400 such prosecutions provides an even bigger loogey to swallow.
For students of effective propaganda, it might be of interest to note
that the US did not use David Bitkower, a white man, as the mouthpiece
for this lie on the occasion of the UPR. As previously noted, most of
the police killings involve a black victim, and accordingly, the US used
one of its black DOJ officials, James Cadogan, to deliver this line of
horse puckey. Cadogan is Senior Counselor to the Assistant Attorney
General.
Well, using the facade of race to convince the naïve population that it
was getting something other than more of the same worked in the 2008
election, did it not?
It
looks like the US, seemingly on a roll of grandiose pronouncements as
to its diligent protection of human rights, did not stop with this false
figure. Other declarations were made at the UPR which were similarly
suspect. For example, according to Kevin Washburn, with the Department
of the Interior, the US has restored about a million acres to Indian
tribes under this administration. Well, that sounds pretty impressive,
doesn’t it?
The problem arises in verifying Washburn’s “million acre” pronouncement.
As it turns out, Washburn also testified before a Congressional
subcommittee just a scant three days after he made the “million acre”
declaration to the UN. In his testimony in front of the Subcommittee on
Indian, Insular and Alaska Native Affairs, US House of Representatives
on May 14, Washburn testified that the Obama administration had restored
“approximately
300,000 acres to tribes.”
That constitutes a rather serious difference in figures. In accordance
with the Uncle Tomism seen in using African American Cadogan to speak on
police abuse, Washburn, who is the Assistant Secretary for Indian
Affairs at the Department of the Interior, also claims to be a member of
the Chickasaw Nation, an Oklahoma tribe.
At the 2010 UPR, the US promised to ratify the Convention On the Rights
of Persons with Disabilities. In fact, Congress voted against
ratification in. 2012. In the US report to the UPR for the 2015 review,
the US stated that “The United States has robust protections to prevent
discrimination against persons with disabilities and has actively
enforced these protections since our last report.” In fact, multiple ADA
(Americans with Disabilities Act) complaints have been filed with the
Department of Justice, stating profound violations of rights affecting
the elderly and disabled by state courts. According to recent statements
made by an ADA employee to this reporter, not one of these complaints
has been pursued by the DOJ.
Another red flag appeared in the US’s statements about the number of
federal hate crimes prosecutions. The US claimed that over 200
individuals had been convicted under federal hate crime laws, including
the Shepard/Byrd Act, in the past five years.
This reporter contacted the DOJ press office as well as the FBI and was
refused details on hate crime convictions. A dedicated internet search,
including DOJ and FBI websites as well as newspaper reports, turned up a
total of 72 convictions for federal hate crimes since 2009. Sixteen of
these convictions—for the infamous Amish beard cutting defendants– were
subsequently reversed in 2014, leaving a grand total of 56.
Parenthetically, as the press office at the US DOJ refused to supply
factual documentation (such as case numbers and names), this reporter
filed a Freedom of Information Request for this information. It is
possible that the fulfillment of this request will provide a different
perspective. For the edification of the readers, the last FOIA request
by this reporter was filed in 2009. I am still awaiting the response.
Recently, the
Wall Street Journal ran an article on the lack of
transparency in the Obama administration and cited multiple problems
with FOIA. According to the article, “Most Administrations play games
with FOIA, but the Obama White House has turned stonewalling into an
art form.”
The WSJ article goes on to discuss the following ploys being utilized to
evade replies to FOIA requests– imposing sky high fees, failing to
process requests within the legal time limit, destroying information and
excessively redacting information.
Access to accurate information is a fundamental part of a democracy. If
the citizenry is kept in the dark about the nature of its governance, it
will not be able to make appropriate decisions. Those in power who play
a shell game with the facts of their activities do so in accordance
with the dedicated purpose of any liar–fear of exposure and avoidance of
accountability.
Janet C. Phelan, investigative journalist and human rights defender
that has traveled pretty extensively over the Asian region, an author of
a tell-all book EXILE, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”, where this article first appeared.