By
Rusticus
Lies, Damned Lies, and Forensic History
As regular consumers of alternative media have likely noticed,
China’s voracious appetite for gold has been reported on
ad nauseam
in the wake of the 2008 Depression. Endless geopolitical and economic
analysts have mused about the implications of Chinese gold accumulation,
with most concluding (perhaps prematurely) that some form of
gold-backed Yuan is on the horizon.
Some extend this scenario further, optimistically declaring that the
BRICS NDB (New Development Bank) and AIIB (Asian Infrastructure
Investment Bank), led by China, will usher in a
“New Golden Era” of progress and prosperity, spelling the end of the Western model of Central Banking tyranny.
The reason for this transfer of precious metals from West to East by the
Anglo-American Establishment, these pundits prognosticate,
is a simple and tragic combination of incompetence and malfeasance. The aged and corrupt West must end, and in the wake of its destruction, the
Phoenix of the East must rise.
Does this narrative, however, have any basis in reality when viewed
within the context of history? How have institutions traditionally
defined as “Globalists” participated in satiating China’s gold fever? Is
the hand of the Red Shield, infamously and intimately involved in the metals market for over 200 years, at work, even in the East?
And what, ultimately, do the answers to these questions spell for the “BRICS Saviour” meme?
To begin answering these questions, we must analyze the history of the
London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) and the ignominious “Precious
Metals Fix” that makes it all possible.
The (Global) Fix Is In
In 2010, the alternative finance community was set ablaze by the revelations of bullion trader turned whistleblower
Andrew MacGuire,
contending that JPMorgan and HSBC, operating as agents for the Federal
Reserve, had suppressed the price of precious metals in an effort to
silence the “Canary in the Coal Mine” amidst unprecedented money
printing. By using managed selloffs via algorithmic trading bots,
bullion banks drove down the price of “electronic/paper” metals
certificates at the COMEX, effectively capping their price and
ultimately driving them down to new 5-year lows.
The Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)
deemed MacGuire’s claims credible enough to warrant further
investigation; led by Bart Chilton, the CFTC’s probe into silver price
manipulation ended in September of 2013 with the stunning declaration
that
no illegal activity had occurred:
Based upon the law and evidence as they exist at this time,
there is not a viable basis to bring an enforcement action with
respect to any firm or its employees related to our investigation of
silver markets. - CFTC Statement
What many fail to realize is that the CFTC’s conclusion is
technically correct. JPMorgan and HSBC were not acting in violation of any
legal structure; they were, in fact, merely implementing the dictates of the long-standing
LBMA Metals Fix:
Already we can identify the hand of the Anglo-American Establishment at
work by way of the East India Company. The LBMA’s commentary on the
nearly global “Silver Standard” of the 17th and 18th Century is not
without consequence; the British Empire’s domination of the gold market
of the era made subjugation of nations like China and India, rich in
silver wealth, notoriously difficult to colonize.
The
Opium Wars
changed this nearly overnight. Beyond the engineered addiction and
mercantile foothold the opium trade gave the East India Company in
China, it also made way for the
wholesale looting of China’s silver wealth:
From China, the Company bought tea, silk and porcelain. The
Chinese wanted silver in return. Over the next 100 years tea became a
very popular drink in England, and there was a fear that too much
silver was leaving the country to pay for it. To stop this happening,
the Company became involved in a triangular trade by smuggling opium (a
highly addictive and illegal drug) from India into China.
The
Company grew opium in India. They were looking for something that the
Chinese would accept instead of silver, to pay for the goods they
bought at Canton. Opium was a valued medicine which could deaden pain,
assist sleep and reduce stress. But it was also seriously addictive and
millions Chinese became dependent on the drug. – British Library
With
China gutted of her material wealth, the Chinese silver standard came
to an end in November of 1935, a mere decade before the implementation
of the first truly “Global Gold Standard,” the Bretton Woods agreement.
The path was set for a worldwide metals price-fixing mechanism, and the
LBMA was more than happy to provide. Front-running the Bretton Woods
agreement by decades, the LBMA’s own gold fix –
run by N.M. Rothschild – was officially established in 1919:
By the LBMA’s own admission, the Rothschilds maintain this price fixing
mechanism to the present, and seemingly, the sole beneficiary of their
recent price suppressing actions is none other than China, the very
country looted of monetary metals a century ago. Is this a rare act of
benevolence from the Rothschild family, or do they have big plans for
the East’s new-found wealth in the coming World Order?
The British analogue to the Council on Foreign Relations,
Chatham House, seems to suggest the latter.
Chatham House Rule and the Gold-Backed SDR
Established in the wake of World War I at the Paris Peace Conference, the
Royal Institute of International Affairs was created. Fulfilling the dream of the
Last Will and Testament of Cecil Rhodes,
the RIIA also birthed its more widely known American outpost, the
Council on Foreign Relations. Its headquarters, Chatham House, have
become the RIIA’s colloquial moniker.
As what many would contend is the world’s premier “Think Tank,” Chatham
House has been far from bashful in exploring a wide range of topics,
and in the wake of the “Great Recession,” gold and the IMF’s “Special
Drawing Rights” (SDRs) have been chief among them. While national
Central Bankers like
Ben Bernanke have been vocal in their opposition towards a remonetization of gold,
the supranational level represented by groups like the IMF, Bank for
International Settlements, the CFR, and Chatham House have been far more
accommodating towards the idea of a return to a “partial gold
standard.” Chatham House has gone so far as to create the “Chatham House
Gold Taskforce” designed explicitly to examine gold’s role in a
“multipolar World Order.”
This task force has yielded a number of fascinating forecasts. Take, for example, these 2011 comments by
Lord Meghnad Desai, the Indian-born, British-naturalized member of the House of Lords and Chatham House member in a paper entitled,
“Gold, the SDR, and Other Matters.” Desai remarks:
Far from challenging gold’s role as a monetary metal, Chatham House is recommending the
exact opposite: Nothing
less than a gold-backed SDR to take the place of the dollar as World
Reserve Currency, with calls for the IMF to make legal the monetization
of gold. All this coming from a man who is a Professor at the Keynesian
London School of Economics, lecturing chiefly on econometrics and
Marxian Economics. Quite the curious blend of ideology, no? Desai’s
commentary is far from the only (seemingly) pro-precious metal rhetoric
born of the “Chatham House Gold Taskforce.” Also included in the
report were the writings of one Catherine Schneck of the University of
Glasgow, entitled,
“Adding Gold to the Valuation of the SDR,” directly echoing Baron Desai’s recommendation:
Schneck, perhaps directly referring to Chinese gold acquisition, makes
specific note of the RMB’s current exclusion from the SDR in the paper’s
introduction. The inclusion of the RMB in the article also seems to
imply that “reducing the USD weighting” as called for in bullet point 3
could indeed be “in favour” of the RMB in the future, overtly stating
that the Euro, Pound, and Yen are unfit for the task:
Schneck concludes her paper by recommending potential avenues to
“mitigate possible obstacles” in implementing a gold-backed SDR.
Manifestations of Globalist “monetary magic” could include:
Allowing the IMF to issue more SDRs than they have gold hearkens back to the
era of bank-issued Gold Certificates and their eventual monetary debasement;
not a new scheme by any means. Nor are “residual” gold claims, which
were commonplace during the Bretton Woods era. The last statement, “not
include any right to sell SDR for gold,” would effectively ensure that
gold could never be redeemed by “citizens” from banks, assuring gold
coinage would never actually circulate.
A pseudo-gold standard if there ever was one.
The Chatham House Gold Taskforce’s premier publication,
“Gold and the International Monetary System,”
maintains the more typical Newspeak of Globalist documents with its
somewhat reserved analysis; its most revealing passages, however,
greatly reinforce the thesis already outlined herein.
The document reiterates the “rising China” narrative, noting that
China’s recent advancements in the form of the recently-launched
Shanghai Gold and Silver Exchange are a “small step” in subverting the
dollar as the World Reserve Currency:
Ultimately, the Chatham House Gold Taskforce concludes that, while the
RMB is a strong contender for reserve currency status, it still lacks
one major prerequisite for the role –
Inclusion in the IMF’s SDR basket:
Chatham House also seems to advocate a digital, cryptographic version of
gold as opposed to physical notes. Perhaps as a direct response to the
rise of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and BitGold, perhaps as the
implementation of a “One World” digital currency as foretold by Nicholas Rockefeller, Chatham House devotes an entire section of its policy paper examining “digital gold.”
So it seems that the Anglo-American Establishment has lofty aspirations
for China’s gold hoard and the RMB after all. Regardless of the manner
by which China’s reunion with precious metals has manifested, however,
this Globalist plot coming to fruition is still dependent upon Chinese
participation.
Is there any evidence to suggest that China desires inclusion into the
SDR basket? Would they allow the West to use their gold as collateral
against the SDR (or something akin to it) as a reserve currency as
opposed to the Yuan?
Enter stage East.
Crouching PBOC, Hidden Bank for International Settlements
Meet the latest actor in our twisted drama, Zhou Xiaochuan:
A Globalist by any objective metric, Xiaochuan is the head honcho at
the People’s Bank of China, effectively the Janet Yellen of Eastasia.
Readers, look into the eyes of this man. If anyone were to lead the
world’s return to
“sound money,” a BRICS without usury, and a gold-backed Yuan utopia of gold-plated puppies and kittens, by necessity, it would have to be China’s most powerful Central Banker.
Think he can pull it off?
Unfortunately for those still steeped in the milieu of the “BRICS
Saviour Paradigm,” I don’t think he particularly wants to. He probably
never has, as long before Xiaochuan began China’s purchase of Rothschild
“fire sale” gold via the LBMA,
he joined the Board of Directors of the Bank for International Settlements.
For readers not yet aware of the specific role the BIS has to play in
the “Rings Within Rings” structure of the Anglo-American Establishment,
it is referred to by Georgetown Professor, Globalist insider, and
whistleblower Carroll Quigley as the “apex” of the “powers of financial
capitalism.”
The powers of financial capitalism had another
far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of
financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system
of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This
system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks
of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in
frequent meetings and conferences.
The apex
of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in
Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s
central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each
central bank…sought to dominate its government by its ability to
control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence
the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence
cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business
world. Professor Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope
It
is to this “apex” which Xiaochuan counts himself as a proud member of,
and it is via this “apex” which he published his official position on
Chinese precious metals, the future of the Yuan, and the SDR. The title
of this BIS paper?
“Reform The International Monetary System,” and its vision for the future is
virtually identical to that of Chatham House and the Anglo-American Establishment.
 |
Xiaochuan
makes mention of the Silver and Gold Standards of the past, right
before discussing the “creative reform” necessary to save the global
monetary system
|
If the Yuan is to become a gold-backed currency (let alone the World
Reserve Currency), it will not be accomplished by the desires of the
People’s Bank of China. It is not the RMB that Xiaochuan applies these
grandiose aspirations to,
but the IMF and its Special Drawing Right:
 |
The PBOC’s recommendation for the SDR as a supra-national reserve currency
|
Presumably, a world in which the SDR is a “super-sovereign reserve
currency” would also include the Yuan in the SDR currency basket. At
least, it will if Xiaochuan and Chatham House have anything to say about
it. And of all those shiny kilo bars of gold and silver recently
re-homed to Shanghai?
Zhou would have them priced in SDRs in international trade. It seems
the PBOC would see the Shanghai Gold Exchange as a mere clearing house
as opposed to a physical exchange devoted to pricing outside the LBMA
fix.
Xiaochuan’s damning statements as head of the PBOC and BIS Board Member
are not his first documented foray into international financial
debauchery. Precious metals researcher and forensic historian Charles
Savoie
contends that Zhou Xiaochuan had participated in the wholesale liquidation of “paper” silver contracts at the behest of the LBMA. If true, this would have effectively lowered the price of silver from 2000-2004 in favor of the COMEX pricing mechanism.
The
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee (GATA) pressed
the LBMA on potential silver price manipulation via Chinese silver
liquidation, much to the chagrin of Jeffrey Christian of the
CPM Group, who referred to China’s paper silver dumping as
a “myth.” A masterful PR move in providing an alibi of sorts for Xiaochuan’s silver manipulation, as the
CPM Group is a 1986 spin-off of none other than the criminal banking syndicate known as
Goldman Sachs.
The same Goldman Sachs that, in 2003, coined the term BRICS and
“forecast” the rise of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa in
a paper entitled,
“Dreaming With BRICs: The Path to 2050.” Bear in mind, this is a
full four years before the BRICs even existed.
What incredible foresight the analysts at Goldman have! Or perhaps it’s
insider knowledge? Maybe even assistance in drafting the BRICs
“vision?” Whatever the case, it is this “BRICS Dream,” the dream of
Goldman Sachs, that the
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development reference when calling on the
BRICS bank to fund “sustainable development” projects throughout Asia:
Some, when faced with the evidence of widespread collusion between
financial Elites of West and East, paraphrase a passage of Sun Tsu’s
The Art of War – “Keep your friends close, your enemies closer,” and perhaps this is indeed the ultimate goal of the People’s Bank of China.
But a similar American saying also comes to mind: “Don’t let the fox inside the hen house.”
In Closing
Has the fog before the eyes of Free Humanity begun to dissipate?
Hopefully enough to realize that the BRICS “anti-hegemon” are no friends
of human autonomy. In viewing the BRICS NDB’s recent appointments to
upper management,
the organization’s participants are barely distinguishable from World Bank and IMF rosters, and while the
controlled demolition of China’s financial crisis just begins to emerge, so, too, will the pre-arranged monetary “solution” to the woes it shall create, as outlined throughout this article.
An end to the “Debt and Death” paradigm will not come from national,
supranational, or hierarchical structures, but from those seeking
Freedom themselves. Unparalleled advancements in decentralization of
trade and manufacturing. Truly local agricultural independence.
Open-source software, not to mention news. Modern pioneers in liberty
are already making great strides in these and many other fields, and it
is from these men and women which hope springs eternal.
Not Zhou Xiaochuan’s Globalist gold hoard and whatever “New World”
monetary paradigm will be foist upon us in the wake of the next
financial crisis.
Image source
Blogging under the pseudonym of Rusticus, the author and freedom
activist operates a website tracing the machinations of the
Anglo-American Establishment throughout history while simultaneously
documenting the process of creating a truly off-grid homestead. (www.statelesshomesteading.com)
This article may be re-posted in full with attribution.
