A punishing drought is forcing a reconsideration of whether the aspiration of untrammeled growth that has for so long been the state’s engine has run against the limits of nature.
LOS
ANGELES — For more than a century, California has been the state where
people flocked for a better life — 164,000 square miles of mountains,
farmland and coastline, shimmering with ambition and dreams, money and
beauty. It was the cutting-edge symbol of possibility: Hollywood,
Silicon Valley, aerospace, agriculture and vineyards.
But
now a punishing drought — and the unprecedented measures the state
announced last week to compel people to reduce water consumption — is
forcing a reconsideration of whether the aspiration of untrammeled
growth that has for so long been this state’s driving engine has run
against the limits of nature.
The 25 percent cut in water consumption ordered
by Gov. Jerry Brown raises fundamental questions about what life in
California will be like in the years ahead, and even whether this state
faces the prospect of people leaving for wetter climates — assuming, as
Mr. Brown and other state leaders do, that this marks a permanent change
in the climate, rather than a particularly severe cyclical drought.
This
state has survived many a catastrophe before — and defied the
doomsayers who have regularly proclaimed the death of the California
dream — as it emerged, often stronger, from the challenges of
earthquakes, an energy crisis and, most recently, a budgetary collapse
that forced years of devastating cuts in spending. These days, the
economy is thriving, the population is growing, the state budget is in
surplus, and development is exploding from Silicon Valley to San Diego;
the evidence of it can be seen in the construction cranes dotting the
skylines of Los Angeles and San Francisco.
But even California’s biggest advocates are wondering if the severity of this drought, now in its fourth year, is going to force a change in the way the state does business.
Can
Los Angeles continue to dominate as the country’s capital of
entertainment and glamour, and Silicon Valley as the center of high
tech, if people are forbidden to take a shower for more than five
minutes and water bills become prohibitively expensive? Will tourists
worry about coming? Will businesses continue their expansion in places
like San Francisco and Venice?
“Mother
Nature didn’t intend for 40 million people to live here,” said Kevin
Starr, a historian at the University of Southern California who has
written extensively about this state. “This is literally a culture that
since the 1880s has progressively invented, invented and reinvented
itself. At what point does this invention begin to hit limits?”
California, Dr. Starr said, “is not going to go under, but we are going to have to go in a different way.”
An
estimated 38.8 million people live in California today, more than
double the 15.7 million people who lived here in 1960, and the state’s
labor force exploded to 18.9 million in 2013 from 6.4 million people in
1960.
California’s $2.2 trillion economy today is the seventh largest
in the world, more than quadruple the $520 billion economy of 1963,
adjusted for inflation. The median household income jumped to an
estimated $61,094 in 2013 from $44,772 in 1960, also adjusted for
inflation.
“You just can’t live the way you always have,” said Mr. Brown, a Democrat who is in his fourth term as governor.
“For
over 10,000 years, people lived in California, but the number of those
people were never more than 300,000 or 400,000,” Mr. Brown said. “Now we
are embarked upon an experiment that no one has ever tried: 38 million
people, with 32 million vehicles, living at the level of comfort that we
all strive to attain. This will require adjustment. This will require
learning.”
But
the drought is now forcing change in a place that long identified
itself as “America’s desert oasis.” Palm Springs has ordered 50 percent
cuts in water use by city agencies, and plans to replace the lawns and
annual flowers around city buildings with native landscapes. It is
digging up the grassy median into town that unfurled before visitors
like a carpet at a Hollywood premiere. It is paying residents to replace
their lawns with rocks and desert plants, and offering rebates to
people who install low-flow toilets.
At
the airport that once welcomed winter-chilled tourists with eight acres
of turf and flowers, city officials are in the early stages of
replacing the grass with cactus, desert bushes and paloverde trees. The
city had hoped to replace the entire lawn, but the project’s $2 million
price tag forced it to begin instead with three acres, said David Ready,
the city manager.
“Years
ago the idea was, come to Palm Springs, and people see the grass and
the lushness and the green,” Mr. Ready said. “We’ve got to change the
way we consume water.“
Fallow Fields
Other
places face different threats to their way of life. Mayor Robert Silva
of Mendota, in the heart of the agricultural Central Valley, said
unemployment among farmworkers had soared as the soil turned to crust
and farmers left half or more of their fields fallow. Many people are
traveling 60 or 70 miles to look for work, Mr. Silva said, and families
are increasingly relying on food donations.
“You can’t pay the bills with free food,” he said. “Give me some water, and I know I can go to work, that’s the bottom line.”
Richard
White, a history professor at Stanford University, said the scarcity of
water could result in a decline in housing construction, at a time when
there has been a burst of desperately needed residential development in
cities like Los Angeles and San Francisco.
“It’s
going to be harder and harder to build new housing without an adequate
water supply,” he said. “How many developments can you afford if you
don’t have water?”
Greg
Smith, 51, a web developer who works from his home in Escondido, said
he was considering moving to Washington State because of his distress at what he described as the state’s slow response to the drought.
“If
this gets out of control, I’ll probably end up leaving,” Mr. Smith
said. “This has been a problem for as long as I’ve been alive.”
“I’ve
watched this state get trampled by developers,” he added. “They keep
building homes, but where’s the water going to come from?”
The
governor’s executive order mandates a 25 percent overall reduction in
water use throughout the state, to be achieved with varying requirements
in different cities and villages. The 400 local water supply agencies
will determine how to achieve that goal;
much of it is expected to be done by imposing new restrictions on lawn
watering. The 25 percent reduction does not apply to farms, which
consume the great bulk of this state’s water.
State
officials signaled on Friday that reductions in water supplies for
farmers were likely to be announced in the coming weeks, and there is
also likely to be increased pressure on the farms to move away from
certain water-intensive crops — like almonds.
A New Normal
Mayor
Eric Garcetti of Los Angeles, pointing to Mr. Brown’s executive order
and his own city’s success in reducing water consumption, said he was
confident that the state would find ways to deal with an era of reduced
water supplies, in a way that would permit it to continue to grow and
thrive.
“We
have to deal with a new normal,” Mr. Garcetti said. “That said, do we
have enough water to sustain life here? Absolutely. Do we have enough
water to grow economically? Absolutely.”
“Cities that are much drier and truly desert — Phoenix, Las Vegas — have shown the ability to have economic growth,” he said.
![]() |
| Añadir leyenda |
A golf course in the Sun City Palm Desert community for older adults sits near barren land about 10 miles east of Palm Springs.
Credit
Damon Winter/The New York Times
Allan
Zaremberg, president of the California Chamber of Commerce, rejected
the idea that the drought and the state’s response to it would prompt
industries to move away or stop adding jobs. “The rest of the economy is
managing it, learning how to deal with it,” he said.
This
is hardly the first crisis California has faced; there has always been a
tension between the natural beauty and delights of living in California
and the external threats, be they the dizzying ups-and-downs of the
state budget, the rolling blackouts during the energy crisis in 2000 and
2001, the earthquakes or periodic droughts.

